We’re all familiar with a newspaper’s ‘comment’ section. Or, as some of them like to call it, their ‘opinion’.
These have been stalwarts of print journalism for many years. But, as Toby Coaker outlined for videojournalismonline back in January, The Times is the only UK based paper to transfer this type of journalism onto the web in video format.
In the States things are a bit different – one example of local political opinion transforming into online video is Ledger Live, from New Jersey’s The Star-Ledger.
Here Brian Donohue gives an often sarcastic/satirical take on the affairs of local government.
Donohue’s producing something that doesn’t really exist in the UK, because national broadcasters (the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky) have to be impartial and national newspapers just haven’t got on board with the idea behind Ledger Live.
The Future
David Cameron’s been a champion of local government since his time in opposition.
As Prime Minister he’s devolving power and says he wants to create more vibrancy in local politics – to get people interested in the affairs of their local councils as part of his ‘Big Society’.
And Jeremy Hunt’s plans for local TV news slip nicely into line with this ideal.
But if the whole plan works and political activism flourishes once again in the boroughs and constituencies of the UK, you can bet that intense frustration will be kindled in the general public when it comes to local TV news.
Local output’s required to be impartial too. As a result Council failure won’t be reported with the angst needed to reflect the voters’ views.
In this political climate there’ll be an opportunity for partial ‘comment’ or ‘opinion’, and the websites of local newspapers will be the platform capable of supporting such a development.
Could they afford it?
On one hand it’s unhelpful to draw comparisons between state newspapers in the USA and their British ‘equivalents’ because New Jersey, for example, has a population of about 9 million and the Star-Ledger’s circulation is about 220,000.
But print journalism’s suffering in the US in the same way it is here.
Sponsoring online video is now an option – adverts screened prior to the content beginning – and could bring in valuable revenue.
And if Ledger Live shows us something else about the future, it’s that you only need basic equipment to bring politics alive for the next media generation.
Here’s The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank proving this very point. Can you imagine a similar video poking fun at 4 or 5 candidates in Garston and Halewood?
VideoJournalismOnline 
Local News – The Future
March 15, 2011 Leave a comment
screenshot courtesy of Ledger Live
We’re all familiar with a newspaper’s ‘comment’ section. Or, as some of them like to call it, their ‘opinion’.
These have been stalwarts of print journalism for many years. But, as Toby Coaker outlined for videojournalismonline back in January, The Times is the only UK based paper to transfer this type of journalism onto the web in video format.
In the States things are a bit different – one example of local political opinion transforming into online video is Ledger Live, from New Jersey’s The Star-Ledger.
Here Brian Donohue gives an often sarcastic/satirical take on the affairs of local government.
A good example is this not too complimentary assessment of Govenor Christie’s selective economic policy.
How does this relate to the UK?
Donohue’s producing something that doesn’t really exist in the UK, because national broadcasters (the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky) have to be impartial and national newspapers just haven’t got on board with the idea behind Ledger Live.
The Future
David Cameron’s been a champion of local government since his time in opposition.
As Prime Minister he’s devolving power and says he wants to create more vibrancy in local politics – to get people interested in the affairs of their local councils as part of his ‘Big Society’.
And Jeremy Hunt’s plans for local TV news slip nicely into line with this ideal.
But if the whole plan works and political activism flourishes once again in the boroughs and constituencies of the UK, you can bet that intense frustration will be kindled in the general public when it comes to local TV news.
Local output’s required to be impartial too. As a result Council failure won’t be reported with the angst needed to reflect the voters’ views.
In this political climate there’ll be an opportunity for partial ‘comment’ or ‘opinion’, and the websites of local newspapers will be the platform capable of supporting such a development.
Could they afford it?
On one hand it’s unhelpful to draw comparisons between state newspapers in the USA and their British ‘equivalents’ because New Jersey, for example, has a population of about 9 million and the Star-Ledger’s circulation is about 220,000.
Each UK constituency has an electorate about 66% smaller than the Star-Ledger’s readership, and local papers would reach dramatically less than that.
But print journalism’s suffering in the US in the same way it is here.
Sponsoring online video is now an option – adverts screened prior to the content beginning – and could bring in valuable revenue.
And if Ledger Live shows us something else about the future, it’s that you only need basic equipment to bring politics alive for the next media generation.
Here’s The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank proving this very point. Can you imagine a similar video poking fun at 4 or 5 candidates in Garston and Halewood?
Filed under Alex Dibble, Bloggers, Broadcast Media, Foreign Media, Print Media, The Future Tagged with Brian Donohue, comment, Dana Milbank, David Cameron, Gareston and Halewood, Jeremy Hunt, journalism, media, New Jersey, news, opinion, politics, The Star-Ledger, The Times, TV, UK, USA, Washington Post, website